Schlakenwald
Schlakenwald, Bohemia · Porcelain · also recorded as Leppert und Haas
Marks
Plate I🔗

from c.1800
S · printed capital · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.476A single roman capital. On its own this is very weak evidence — an S is used by many works — so treat it as consistent with Schlakenwald rather than as proof of it.
Plate II🔗

from c.1800
S, in script · painted script · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.476The second form Chaffers engraves for the same works. He does not date the two relative to each other.
What the source records
- Established about the year 1800, making hard paste.Chaffers 1891 · p.476
- Chaffers calls it the oldest porcelain manufactory in Austria except Vienna.Chaffers 1891 · p.476
- George Leppert was the owner in 1842 and much improved the industry in the state.Chaffers 1891 · p.476
- Some pieces are marked 'Leppert und Haas' in words rather than with an initial.Chaffers 1891 · p.476
Why this differs from other listings
Chaffers records a third mark in words — 'Leppert und Haas' — tied to George Leppert's ownership in 1842. A piece carrying that wording is therefore datable to the Leppert period, which a bare S is not.
The source page

What this entry does not establish
- Chaffers does not date the two S marks relative to one another.
- A single letter mark is not diagnostic. This entry records what the source engraves for these works; it does not claim every S is Schlakenwald.
Questions
What marks does Chaffers 1891 record for Schlakenwald?
2 on p.476: S (from c.1800); S, in script (from c.1800). 2 of them are engraved in the source and are reproduced above; the rest are described in words only.
What dates does the source give?
The dates Chaffers attaches to these marks fall between 1800. They are his, not an inference drawn here, and several are given as approximate or open-ended in the original wording shown on each plate.
Where was Schlakenwald?
Schlakenwald, Bohemia. The source also records the name as Leppert und Haas.
Can this page tell me what my piece is worth?
No. This site reports what one nineteenth-century reference recorded, and cites the page so you can check it. It does not authenticate objects, value them, or offer an opinion on a specific piece.

