The BackstampPottery and porcelain marks, traced to the reference that records them.

Doccia

Doccia, near Sesto, outside Florence, Italy · Porcelain · also recorded as Ginori, Richard Ginori

Transcribed by Igor Kukolj from Chaffers, William. Marks and Monograms on European and Oriental Pottery and Porcelain, 1891, Reeves & Turner, London, p.428. Scan: archive.org/details/marksmonogramson00chaf (leaf n447). Checked 22 August 2026.

Marks

Plate I🔗

The A double triangle mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 428
A double triangle · stamped in gold · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.428

Chaffers says it is stamped in gold on the BEST pieces, so the mark carries a quality grade as well as an origin.

Plate II🔗

The GINORI mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 428
GINORI · impressed · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.428

The name of the Marchese, sometimes impressed. Chaffers records that it is occasionally abbreviated, with only GIN. used.

Plate III🔗

The N.S. mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 428
N.S. · painted · engraved in the source
Recorded on a tea-service painted with nymphs and satyrs, and a milkpot with Carnival figures and a garden scene.Chaffers 1891, p.428

Attributed to Nicolo Sebastiano. Chaffers treats the attribution as settled because a full déjeûner service carried N.S together with the GINORI name.

Plate IV🔗

The CA mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 428
CA · impressed · engraved in the source
Recorded on a teacup and saucer in the Rev. T. Staniforth's Collection, in addition to the N.S mark.Chaffers 1891, p.428

A supplementary impressed mark rather than a primary one. Chaffers records another piece carrying P.G. in the same position.

Plate V🔗

The A mullet and double triangle mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 428
A mullet and double triangle · blue or gold · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.428

A modification of the double-triangle mark, used on superior quality porcelain.

What the source records

Why this differs from other listings

Chaffers explains the single most consequential fact about Italian porcelain marks and most listings omit it: when Capo di Monte closed in 1821 its moulds went to Doccia, which then reproduced the ware AND imitated the mark. He writes that Europe was in consequence inundated with false Capo di Monte, purchasable to any extent at Doccia itself. A crowned N is therefore not evidence of Capo di Monte, and the reason is documented rather than rumoured.

The source page

Page 428 of Chaffers 1891, the source for this entry
Chaffers 1891, p.428 — public domain, from archive.org/details/marksmonogramson00chaf (leaf n447). Check the transcription against it.

What this entry does not establish

Questions

What marks does Chaffers 1891 record for Doccia?

5 on p.428: A double triangle; GINORI; N.S.; CA; A mullet and double triangle. 5 of them are engraved in the source and are reproduced above; the rest are described in words only.

What dates does the source give?

None. Chaffers dates no mark on this page, so this entry gives no date either.

Where was Doccia?

Doccia, near Sesto, outside Florence, Italy. The source also records the name as Ginori, Richard Ginori.

Can this page tell me what my piece is worth?

No. This site reports what one nineteenth-century reference recorded, and cites the page so you can check it. It does not authenticate objects, value them, or offer an opinion on a specific piece.

Marks like this one