The BackstampPottery and porcelain marks, traced to the reference that records them.

Worcester

Worcester, England · Porcelain · also recorded as Royal Worcester Porcelain Works, Flight & Barr, Barr, Flight & Barr, Flight, Barr & Barr

Transcribed by Igor Kukolj from Chaffers, William. Marks and Monograms on European and Oriental Pottery and Porcelain, 1891, Reeves & Turner, London, p.723. Scan: archive.org/details/marksmonogramson00chaf (leaf n742). Checked 22 August 2026.

Marks

Plate I🔗

The Flight & Barr, with a crown mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 723

1793–1807

Flight & Barr, with a crown · script, beneath a crown · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.723

Chaffers sets this engraving beside the sentence naming Joseph Flight and Martin Barr as proprietors from 1793 to 1807, and says they 'used this mark'.

Plate II🔗

The Barr Flight & Barr mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 723

1807–1813

Barr Flight & Barr · script · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.723paired by position

Positioned against the passage covering the 1807–1813 partnership. The pairing is by position on the page; Chaffers does not restate the dates in the caption.

Plate III🔗

The B.F.B. beneath a crown mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 723

1807–1813

B.F.B. beneath a crown · impressed, without colour · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.723

Chaffers states this one explicitly: 'Messrs. Barr, Flight & Barr, 1807 to 1813. The letters B. F. B. with a crown above, impressed on the ware without colour.' Impressed and uncoloured is the detail that separates it from a printed mark.

Plate IV🔗

The BARR FLIGHT & BARR · Royal Porcelain Works · WORCESTER · London-House, No. 1 Coventry Street mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 723
BARR FLIGHT & BARR · Royal Porcelain Works · WORCESTER · London-House, No. 1 Coventry Street · printed, beneath two crowns · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.723

The full printed factory mark, including the London-house address set below a rule. Chaffers prints the address as part of the same block, and the cropper now keeps them together.

Plate V🔗

The Flight Barr & Barr mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 723

1813–1829

Flight Barr & Barr · script · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.723

Chaffers gives the initials for this firm as F.B.B., 'also impressed on the ware without colour, used from 1813 to 1829'.

What the source records

Why this differs from other listings

The Flight and Barr partnerships changed name four times in fifty years, and the mark changes with them — which makes a Worcester mark a date, not just an attribution. This entry keeps each engraving beside the years Chaffers gives it, and labels the two cases where the pairing is positional rather than stated. Listings that show the marks without the partnership dates leave out the only reason to look them up.

The source page

Page 723 of Chaffers 1891, the source for this entry
Chaffers 1891, p.723 — public domain, from archive.org/details/marksmonogramson00chaf (leaf n742). Check the transcription against it.

What this entry does not establish

Questions

What marks does Chaffers 1891 record for Worcester?

5 on p.723: Flight & Barr, with a crown (1793–1807); Barr Flight & Barr (1807–1813); B.F.B. beneath a crown (1807–1813); BARR FLIGHT & BARR · Royal Porcelain Works · WORCESTER · London-House, No. 1 Coventry Street; Flight Barr & Barr (1813–1829). 5 of them are engraved in the source and are reproduced above; the rest are described in words only.

What dates does the source give?

The dates Chaffers attaches to these marks fall between 1793 and 1813. They are his, not an inference drawn here, and several are given as approximate or open-ended in the original wording shown on each plate.

Where was Worcester?

Worcester, England. The source also records the name as Royal Worcester Porcelain Works, Flight & Barr, Barr, Flight & Barr, Flight, Barr & Barr.

Is the Barr Flight & Barr attribution certain?

No, and the source says so. Chaffers flags it — paired by position. Positioned against the passage covering the 1807–1813 partnership. The pairing is by position on the page; Chaffers does not restate the dates in the caption.

Can this page tell me what my piece is worth?

No. This site reports what one nineteenth-century reference recorded, and cites the page so you can check it. It does not authenticate objects, value them, or offer an opinion on a specific piece.

Marks like this one