The BackstampPottery and porcelain marks, traced to the reference that records them.

Elbogen

Elbogen, Bohemia · Porcelain · also recorded as Haidinger

Transcribed by Igor Kukolj from Chaffers, William. Marks and Monograms on European and Oriental Pottery and Porcelain, 1891, Reeves & Turner, London, p.476. Scan: archive.org/details/marksmonogramson00chaf (leaf n495). Checked 22 August 2026.

Marks

Plate I🔗

The An arm holding a scimitar mark as engraved in Chaffers 1891, page 476

from 1815

An arm holding a scimitar · stamped without colour · engraved in the sourceChaffers 1891, p.476

Chaffers blazons it precisely: 'heraldically or, a dexter arm habited gules, holding a scimitar arg.' The device is a pun on the town — Elbogen means elbow — which is why an arm appears on porcelain with no other heraldic reason to be there.

What the source records

Why this differs from other listings

The mark is a canting device: Elbogen is German for elbow, so the factory signed itself with a bent arm. Knowing that turns an obscure pictorial stamp into something you can reason about rather than merely match, and Chaffers supplies the full heraldic blazon rather than a vague description.

The source page

Page 476 of Chaffers 1891, the source for this entry
Chaffers 1891, p.476 — public domain, from archive.org/details/marksmonogramson00chaf (leaf n495). Check the transcription against it.

What this entry does not establish

Questions

What marks does Chaffers 1891 record for Elbogen?

1 on p.476: An arm holding a scimitar (from 1815). 1 of them are engraved in the source and are reproduced above; the rest are described in words only.

What dates does the source give?

The dates Chaffers attaches to these marks fall between 1815. They are his, not an inference drawn here, and several are given as approximate or open-ended in the original wording shown on each plate.

Where was Elbogen?

Elbogen, Bohemia. The source also records the name as Haidinger.

Can this page tell me what my piece is worth?

No. This site reports what one nineteenth-century reference recorded, and cites the page so you can check it. It does not authenticate objects, value them, or offer an opinion on a specific piece.

Marks like this one